A discussion of the third of three major factors that account for the difficulty the defense has with presenting a general causation case to a jury.

How lawyers and scientists can present evidence in a way that makes sense to everyone, lawyers, scientists, and jurors alike.

This article discusses the second of three major factors that account for the difficulty the defense has with presenting a general causation case to a jury.

A guide for interviewing jury consultants that will make the task easier and more effective.

A discussion of hindsight bias in the context of litigation, and how to reduce it.

A tactic defense attorneys involved in settlement discussions may use when what they believe to be perfectly reasonable settlement offers are rejected by the plaintiff.

The best jury selection decision will be made by an experienced attorney who has internalized a good jury profile (that is, he or she believes it and intuitively understands it).

This article discusses the first of three major factors that account for the difficulty the defense has with presenting a general causation case to a jury.

Primacy and recency theory predicts people will best remember information that occurs at the beginning and end of communications, and will be more likely to forget what is in the middle. This theory doesn't necessarily apply to jury trials. An alternative is presented.

Advice for lawyers: it's hard to tell if a prospective juror is lying.